From ???@??? Sat May 04 08:18:38 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g440u7Fs005734 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 20:56:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g440u6Hw009892 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 20:56:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g440tca02319; Fri, 3 May 2002 18:55:38 -0600 Resent-Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 18:55:38 -0600 X-Original-Sender: janab@websweweave.net Fri May 3 18:55:38 2002 From: "Jana Black" Old-To: , "'Vicki'" Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 17:55:19 -0700 Message-ID: <00d401c1f306$5c9f1f50$f2a4ec0c@JANA> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <10368.66.129.5.5.1018963916.squirrel@control.chattanooga.net> Subject: [Board-Exec] Away... Resent-Message-ID: <4-zSq.A.Ek.KGz08@lists2.rootsweb.com> To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1907 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: hL2"!o3("!W)f!!a1h"! Hello all, I will be away from now until Sunday evening. I have written to ask Vicki to be my Proxy until then and she has agreed. I hereby authorize Vicki Lindsay to vote in my name from 6 PM 3 May 2002 until midnight 5 May 2002, should the need arise. Jana Black SW/SC CC Rep USGW Project From ???@??? Sat May 04 08:18:38 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g440vjFs005881 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 20:57:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g440viHw010031 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 20:57:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g440vIA04435; Fri, 3 May 2002 18:57:18 -0600 Resent-Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 18:57:18 -0600 X-Original-Sender: janab@websweweave.net Fri May 3 18:57:18 2002 From: "Jana Black" Old-To: Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 17:56:58 -0700 Message-ID: <00d501c1f306$981f0e50$f2a4ec0c@JANA> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Subject: [Board-Exec] FW: Away... Resent-Message-ID: <69c1W.A.EFB.uHz08@lists2.rootsweb.com> To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1908 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: WZ&"!)X#"!8EO!!^E\!! That is PST... Have a good weekend all! Jana -----Original Message----- From: Jana Black [mailto:janab@websweweave.net] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:55 PM To: 'Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com'; 'Vicki' Subject: Away... Hello all, I will be away from now until Sunday evening. I have written to ask Vicki to be my Proxy until then and she has agreed. I hereby authorize Vicki Lindsay to vote in my name from 6 PM 3 May 2002 until midnight 5 May 2002, should the need arise. Jana Black SW/SC CC Rep USGW Project From ???@??? Sat May 04 08:18:38 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4413lFs006264 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 21:03:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4413kHw010710 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 21:03:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g4413So02947; Fri, 3 May 2002 19:03:28 -0600 Resent-Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 19:03:28 -0600 X-Original-Sender: janab@websweweave.net Fri May 3 19:03:27 2002 From: "Jana Black" Old-To: Subject: RE: [Board-Exec] FW: Away...take 2 Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 18:03:08 -0700 Message-ID: <00d701c1f307$746289a0$f2a4ec0c@JANA> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <00d501c1f306$981f0e50$f2a4ec0c@JANA> Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1909 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: D>-!!5%P"!aH>"!aK@!! Sorry Everyone! I am obviously in a HUGE hurry to get out the door. Let me try again: I will be away from now until Sunday evening. I have written to ask Vicki to be my Proxy until then and she has agreed. I hereby authorize Vicki Shaffer to vote in my name from 6 PM PST, 3 May 2002 until midnight PST, 5 May 2002, should the need arise. Jana Black SW/SC CC Rep USGW Project From ???@??? Sat May 04 08:18:38 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g44157Fs006352 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 21:05:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g44155Hw010802 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 21:05:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g4414i904030; Fri, 3 May 2002 19:04:44 -0600 Resent-Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 19:04:44 -0600 X-Original-Sender: TVick65536@aol.com Fri May 3 19:04:44 2002 From: TVick65536@aol.com Message-ID: <120.fa9eb45.2a048da2@aol.com> Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 21:04:34 EDT Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] Away... Old-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10503 Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1910 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: D\g!!Dm+"!Fc'"!IOB"! Well, aren't you just special. Your way or the highway huh? Jana, this is unacceptable, IMHO. Tina In a message dated 5/3/2002 8:55:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time, janab@websweweave.net writes: > Hello all, > > I will be away from now until Sunday evening. I have written to ask > Vicki to be my Proxy until then and she has agreed. > > I hereby authorize Vicki Lindsay to vote in my name from 6 PM 3 May 2002 > until midnight 5 May 2002, should the need arise. > > Jana Black > SW/SC CC Rep USGW Project > > From ???@??? Sat May 04 08:18:38 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g441AkFs006715 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 21:10:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g441AiHw011466 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 21:10:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g441AKM12301; Fri, 3 May 2002 19:10:20 -0600 Resent-Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 19:10:20 -0600 X-Original-Sender: usgenweb@cox.net Fri May 3 19:10:19 2002 Message-Id: <4.3.2.20020503211005.00cafba0@pop.east.cox.net> X-Sender: usgenweb@pop.east.cox.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3 Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 21:11:04 -0400 Old-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com From: Holly Timm Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] FW: Away... In-Reply-To: <00d501c1f306$981f0e50$f2a4ec0c@JANA> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1911 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: _9+"!b0'#!=lT"!%`h"! With no standing rule passed to permit this, this proxy is out of order. At 05:56 PM 5/3/02 -0700, Jana Black wrote: >That is PST... Have a good weekend all! Jana > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jana Black [mailto:janab@websweweave.net] >Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:55 PM >To: 'Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com'; 'Vicki' >Subject: Away... > > >Hello all, > >I will be away from now until Sunday evening. I have written to ask >Vicki to be my Proxy until then and she has agreed. > >I hereby authorize Vicki Lindsay to vote in my name from 6 PM 3 May 2002 >until midnight 5 May 2002, should the need arise. > >Jana Black >SW/SC CC Rep USGW Project From ???@??? Sat May 04 08:18:38 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g442WcFs011762 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 22:32:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g442WaHw019791 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 22:32:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g442W4O05980; Fri, 3 May 2002 20:32:04 -0600 Resent-Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 20:32:04 -0600 X-Original-Sender: rkeason@tir.com Fri May 3 20:32:03 2002 Message-ID: <014801c1f313$7f45e5e0$b5a028d8@hppav> From: "Ron Eason" Old-To: References: <4.3.2.20020503211005.00cafba0@pop.east.cox.net> Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] FW: Away... Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 22:29:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Resent-Message-ID: <9jjdOC.A.OdB.kg008@lists2.rootsweb.com> To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1912 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: :_l!!BV=!!\*U"!mOB!! This is definitely NOT a vote made and expressed by the voter, and posted to the list. This is a proxy and cannot be accepted. Jana you should have stated what your vote would be based upon whether the motion was called to a vote and offered that Tina would be posting your vote in it's entirety to the BOARD-I at the appropriate time. I thought this was just covered earlier? Ron ----- Original Message ----- From: "Holly Timm" To: Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:11 PM Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] FW: Away... > > With no standing rule passed to permit this, this proxy is out of order. > > At 05:56 PM 5/3/02 -0700, Jana Black wrote: > >That is PST... Have a good weekend all! Jana > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Jana Black [mailto:janab@websweweave.net] > >Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:55 PM > >To: 'Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com'; 'Vicki' > >Subject: Away... > > > > > >Hello all, > > > >I will be away from now until Sunday evening. I have written to ask > >Vicki to be my Proxy until then and she has agreed. > > > >I hereby authorize Vicki Lindsay to vote in my name from 6 PM 3 May 2002 > >until midnight 5 May 2002, should the need arise. > > > >Jana Black > >SW/SC CC Rep USGW Project > > > From ???@??? Sat May 04 08:18:45 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g44C9aFs015132 for ; Sat, 4 May 2002 08:09:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g44C9YHw009736 for ; Sat, 4 May 2002 08:09:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g44C9Kx21263; Sat, 4 May 2002 06:09:20 -0600 Resent-Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 06:09:20 -0600 X-Original-Sender: TVick65536@aol.com Sat May 4 06:09:19 2002 From: TVick65536@aol.com Message-ID: <125.101774ac.2a05295b@aol.com> Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 08:08:59 EDT Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] FW: Away... Old-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10503 Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1913 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: non!!Ko["!,Bp!!@:&"! Ron, I believe you mean Vicki, not Tina Tina In a message dated 5/3/2002 10:32:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time, rkeason@tir.com writes: > This is definitely NOT a vote made and expressed > by the voter, and posted to the list. This is a proxy > and cannot be accepted. Jana you should have stated > what your vote would be based upon whether the > motion was called to a vote and offered that Tina would > be posting your vote in it's entirety to the BOARD-I > at the appropriate time. I thought this was just covered > earlier? > > Ron > > > From ???@??? Sat May 04 11:09:49 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g44EqxFs023751 for ; Sat, 4 May 2002 10:52:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g44EqvHw024930 for ; Sat, 4 May 2002 10:52:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g44EqeV16241; Sat, 4 May 2002 08:52:40 -0600 Resent-Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 08:52:40 -0600 X-Original-Sender: wchs@getgoin.net Sat May 4 08:52:40 2002 Message-ID: <006501c1f37b$e27c2bc0$db967a3f@wchs> From: "Phyllis Rippee" Old-To: Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 09:55:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Declude-Spoolname: Df4f98cae00588c6a.SMD Subject: [Board-Exec] Voting Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1914 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: g@?!!M]c!!e-n!!;Xh"! Jana, It not proper since one couldn't vote a proxy on a motion allowing proxy voting because it wouldn't be a rule of the organization that a proxy vote could be cast until AFTER the motion passed. Phyllis From ???@??? Mon May 06 06:20:24 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g45K0aFs026591 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 16:00:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g45K0ZHw024194 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 16:00:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g45K0E332699; Sun, 5 May 2002 14:00:14 -0600 Resent-Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 14:00:14 -0600 X-Original-Sender: tstowell@chattanooga.net Sun May 5 14:00:10 2002 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20020505065216.008e4d40@mail.chattanooga.net> X-Sender: tstowell@mail.chattanooga.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 06:52:16 -0400 Old-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com From: Tim Stowell Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] Voting In-Reply-To: <006501c1f37b$e27c2bc0$db967a3f@wchs> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1915 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: #k'#!2IQ!!NE1!!883!! At 09:55 AM 5/4/02 -0500, you wrote: >Jana, It not proper since one couldn't vote a proxy on a motion allowing >proxy voting because it wouldn't be a rule of the organization that a proxy >vote could be cast until AFTER the motion passed. > >Phyllis Yikes, that took 3 readings - how many times can one use the word proxy in a sentence? :) Tim From ???@??? Mon May 06 17:45:49 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g46CTxFs022746 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 08:29:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g46CTvHw020046 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 08:29:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g46CTHx32039; Mon, 6 May 2002 06:29:17 -0600 Resent-Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 06:29:17 -0600 X-Original-Sender: kheidel@tri.net Mon May 6 06:29:17 2002 Message-ID: <00b001c1f4f9$e24521a0$89f499cd@sasnak.net> From: "Kathy Heidel" Old-To: "Board-Exec" Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 07:31:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Subject: [Board-Exec] Voting Resent-Message-ID: <3tp2VC.A.c0H.dcn18@lists2.rootsweb.com> To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1916 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: >eE"!j6c"!0NL"!Eh*!! Do you recall Tina, Pam, and others, during Nov - Dec 1998 when Bob Bamford was NC? The Board had a major turnover, Nancy, Maureen, Betsy was temp NC, then Bob and I came on Board. Supposedly there wasn't such a thing as Board Ex, but there was and everyone was really upset that the membership had found out about it. Well at that time almost all of the AB business was discussed on EX and then the results taken to the Board List and presented as a motion and then voted on. Why would Teresa, myself and perhaps others promised during the campaign of this past year that the AB would conduct business on Board L? I can't and did not state that this was a fact for other sessions other than the one I was one. I have been threatened by others for stating this, but it was the truth when I was on the AB and if you and the others would like I can step down. I am not in the habit of lying and have not done so at this time. If I have made an error I state that fact and admit to my mistake. This however is not the case at this time. And I am not quite senile, yet. Kathy From ???@??? Mon May 06 22:11:53 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g46MFGFs015580 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 18:15:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.123]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g46MFFHw005985 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 18:15:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g46MDRB27460; Mon, 6 May 2002 16:13:27 -0600 Resent-Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 16:13:27 -0600 X-Original-Sender: janab@websweweave.net Mon May 6 16:13:26 2002 From: "Jana Black" Old-To: Subject: RE: [BOARD-L] EXEC list Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 15:12:35 -0700 Message-ID: <017001c1f54b$20568d20$f2a4ec0c@JANA> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020506081217.033446c0@mail.1starnet.com> Resent-Message-ID: To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/9354 X-Loop: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: BOARD-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: ,_l!!AZ6!!CX9"!A9e!! Hello all, Just back from a marvelous weekend in Fort Bragg - full of the sounds of seals, waves; the smells of rhodies and the sights of CA's amazing coast! I do feel lucky! The conversation that has transpired regarding EXEC over the weekend *exactly* makes my point! I am going to stubbornly take one more stab at it.... What seems to be being said is that EXEC was used once for two days in a way that AB members pretty immediately deemed unacceptable, and ended. Ever since a few people have tried to bleed the proverbial rock dry. This topic has been used to trash what is otherwise mostly agreed to be a useful and necessary tool within our Project for the AB to have and use. It is about working together where the field is level and we all work as equals, not competitors! Even Tina agreed with Betsy that EXEC had not been improperly used, yet she is still apparently so afraid of what people "might think" that she wants to deny us appropriate use of it in sensitive situations simply because there might be someone who gets upset - go figure! Sorry, I think it is time to "take the chance" in appropriate ways - as you all know this AB has done since the beginning of this AB term where EXEC is concerned..... There is no fire to put out, no one is doing anything horrid... in fact we are doing about nothing. That is far worse. Jana -----Original Message----- From: Betsy Mills [mailto:betsym@1starnet.com] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 8:13 AM To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Voting Oh, and do check your records. *I* was the person that protested on day 2. Betsy On 08:01 AM 5/6/2002 -0700, Betsy Mills said: >That was a new AB struggling to figure out how to conduct the project's >business and lasted for 2 days. It was also 1998, not 1997. > >Betsy > > > >On 06:29 AM 5/6/2002 -0400, merope said: >>At 08:58 PM 5/5/02 -0700, Betsy Mills wrote: >>>On 03:29 PM 5/3/2002 -0500, Kathy Heidel said: >>>> Actually all AB business was formerly conducted on Board-Exec. >>> >>>Absolutely NOT! And I am sick and tired of the insinuation that it >>>was >>>used for public business! >>> >>>Betsy >> >>A quote from Bob Bamford, acting NC when the list was formed in >>November >>1997: >> >>"This closed list is used for discussions and information transfer. We >>discuss an issue and once we reach a relative consensus, someone proposes >>a motion to be placed on the board list. Assuming their [sic] is a second >>we then call for a vote. If their [sic] is further disagreement it is >>discussed HERE." >> >>-Teresa > From ???@??? Mon May 06 22:11:53 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g46MFvFs015656 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 18:15:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g46MFtHw006038 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 18:15:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g46MFKY15731; Mon, 6 May 2002 16:15:20 -0600 Resent-Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 16:15:20 -0600 X-Original-Sender: janab@websweweave.net Mon May 6 16:15:20 2002 From: "Jana Black" Old-To: Subject: RE: [Board-Exec] Voting Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 15:14:28 -0700 Message-ID: <017301c1f54b$63978030$f2a4ec0c@JANA> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <006501c1f37b$e27c2bc0$db967a3f@wchs> Resent-Message-ID: <1vRvPD.A.m1D.4Bw18@lists2.rootsweb.com> To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1917 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: S(g!!"!2%]!!iK^!! The worst thing is that so many of you took me seriously - hope you all had a glorious weekend! Let's see what gets done this week... Jana -----Original Message----- From: Phyllis Rippee [mailto:wchs@getgoin.net] Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 7:56 AM To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [Board-Exec] Voting Jana, It not proper since one couldn't vote a proxy on a motion allowing proxy voting because it wouldn't be a rule of the organization that a proxy vote could be cast until AFTER the motion passed. Phyllis From ???@??? Mon May 06 22:11:53 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g46MUjFs016803 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 18:30:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.123]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g46MUiHw007773 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 18:30:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g46MSlg25049; Mon, 6 May 2002 16:28:47 -0600 Resent-Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 16:28:47 -0600 X-Original-Sender: TVick65536@aol.com Mon May 6 16:28:46 2002 From: TVick65536@aol.com Message-ID: <9.27a44c7b.2a085d9c@aol.com> Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 18:28:44 EDT Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] EXEC list Old-To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10503 Resent-Message-ID: To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/9358 X-Loop: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: BOARD-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: _Yi!!'$""!6,%"!-Fo"! In a message dated 5/6/2002 6:16:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time, janab@websweweave.net writes: > yet she is still apparently so afraid of > what people "might think" that she wants to deny us appropriate use of > it in sensitive situations simply because there might be someone who > gets upset - go figure! > > What I was commenting on was that absentee voting on Board EXEC is unacceptable. Tina From ???@??? Mon May 06 22:11:53 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g46N4cFs019961 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 19:04:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists5.rootsweb.com (lists5.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.123]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g46N4bHw012092 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 19:04:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists5.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g46N1kF01619; Mon, 6 May 2002 17:01:46 -0600 Resent-Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 17:01:46 -0600 X-Original-Sender: janab@websweweave.net Mon May 6 17:01:45 2002 From: "Jana Black" Old-To: Subject: RE: [BOARD-L] EXEC list Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 16:00:05 -0700 Message-ID: <017801c1f551$c348d190$f2a4ec0c@JANA> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <9.27a44c7b.2a085d9c@aol.com> Resent-Message-ID: To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/9361 X-Loop: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: BOARD-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: 4U?!!$AK"!i@g"!Fh]!! Then Tina, perhaps you should go back and re-read the conversation that led there! *No one* was talking about actually "voting" - the conversation was about someone who knew they were going to be absent recording ... call it ... a "memo" on EXEC regarding how they would like their *potential* vote to be counted, should a vote arise in their absence. In this way, every AB would know the vote was true IF it ended up being included and the NC or the Secretary would announce it, IF a vote came up on BOARD-L. This way constituents would see their Rep had done their job even "in absentia." Making such a post would of course be up to the discretion of the sender and no one knows what or whether anything would necessarily come to a vote during their absence in any case. Regarding the suggestion that others might be "influenced" (not from you Tina - someone else came up with that one) ... Give me a break! In this crowd, I think we are all pretty independent and strong.... I seriously doubt that would be a problem. BTW, it is fine with me that it did not get a second, I was simply trying to get something done out of respect for those who had liked the concept before I left... Since I had the voiced support of several AB members, I decided to try some wording. I made it a motion knowing I would not be around to take amendments - figured you'd like it or dump it while I was gone - it happened. Jana -----Original Message----- From: TVick65536@aol.com [mailto:TVick65536@aol.com] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:29 PM To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] EXEC list In a message dated 5/6/2002 6:16:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time, janab@websweweave.net writes: > yet she is still apparently so afraid of > what people "might think" that she wants to deny us appropriate use of > it in sensitive situations simply because there might be someone who > gets upset - go figure! > > What I was commenting on was that absentee voting on Board EXEC is unacceptable. Tina From ???@??? Fri May 10 06:45:32 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4A5KZFs010607 for ; Fri, 10 May 2002 01:20:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4A5KYHw015956 for ; Fri, 10 May 2002 01:20:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g4A5Jm631870; Thu, 9 May 2002 23:19:48 -0600 Resent-Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 23:19:48 -0600 X-Original-Sender: tstowell@chattanooga.net Thu May 9 23:19:48 2002 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20020510012116.020d15c0@mail.chattanooga.net> X-Sender: tstowell@mail.chattanooga.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 01:21:16 -0400 Old-To: board-exec-l@rootsweb.com From: Tim Stowell Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [Board-Exec] [NYGEN-L] Holly's Puter Problems Resent-Message-ID: <9_UdGD.A.zxH.0h128@lists2.rootsweb.com> To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1918 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: ZUF!!mCj!!`5,"!-8,!! >From NYGEN-L: >Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 08:28:42 -0400 >From: Lorraine Sonnenberg Newsome >Subject: [NYGEN-L] Holly's Puter Problems >To: NYGEN-L@rootsweb.com > >Forget to mention this in my last message. > >Holly is having major computer problems. If you have tried to contact her >in the last week or so, please email me and I'll get the message to her or >I'll try to take care of it if it needs immediate attention. (She's only >about 15 min from me, so I can check with her before doing anything! LOL) > >She is basically rebuilding and reinstalling everything from scratch with >the help of PaPaT. Let's do a "prayer call" that all goes well and she's up >and running very soon!! > >Sunny From ???@??? Sat May 11 08:51:04 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4BBSVFs021144 for ; Sat, 11 May 2002 07:28:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4BBSTHw022103 for ; Sat, 11 May 2002 07:28:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g4BBS9U32619; Sat, 11 May 2002 05:28:09 -0600 Resent-Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 05:28:09 -0600 X-Original-Sender: tstowell@chattanooga.net Sat May 11 05:28:08 2002 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20020511051638.008c6340@mail.chattanooga.net> X-Sender: foghorn@mail.chattanooga.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 05:16:38 -0400 Old-To: board-exec-l@rootsweb.com From: Tim Stowell Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [Board-Exec] away Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1919 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: H>F!!KS>"!ph~!!Ec-!! Going away to see Mom for Mother's Day. Happy Mother's Day all. Tim From ???@??? Tue May 14 18:51:47 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4ECDBFs022410 for ; Tue, 14 May 2002 08:13:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4ECD9Hw001661 for ; Tue, 14 May 2002 08:13:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g4ECCfo12798; Tue, 14 May 2002 06:12:41 -0600 Resent-Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 06:12:41 -0600 X-Original-Sender: ky.quest@gte.net Tue May 14 06:12:41 2002 Message-ID: <000901c1fb40$9fdbdeb0$6401a8c0@Diane> From: "Diane M. Parsons" Old-To: "Board-Exe" Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 08:12:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Subject: [Board-Exec] Resignation Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1920 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: pQH!!IRc"!9MW"!d,M!! Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5 I herby formally submit my resignation as a AB Board Member, effective May 14, 2002. This decision has come after much soul-searching and is final. Personal concerns have been a huge factor in making this decision, including my firm belief that personal conflicts and inflated egos among my fellow Board Members will never allow us to accomplish the duties we set out to do in the first place. I wish each and everyone of you all the best and pray that you are able to learn to work together just a wee bit better. Diane Montgomery Parsons May 14, 2002 From ???@??? Thu May 16 06:06:08 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4FM8fFs008016 for ; Wed, 15 May 2002 18:08:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4FM8eHw013684 for ; Wed, 15 May 2002 18:08:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g4FM8BS06741; Wed, 15 May 2002 16:08:11 -0600 Resent-Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 16:08:11 -0600 X-Original-Sender: usgenweb@cox.net Wed May 15 16:08:10 2002 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020515180800.00a04e30@mail.bright.net> X-Sender: usgenweb@pop.east.cox.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 18:09:10 -0400 Old-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com From: Holly Timm In-Reply-To: <000901c1fb40$9fdbdeb0$6401a8c0@Diane> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: [Board-Exec] Re: Resignation Resent-Message-ID: <0Y0cbD.A.ApB.Lxt48@lists2.rootsweb.com> To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1921 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: Y1S!!HkJ!!I4E!!WDn!! I am sorry to see you go but respect your decision. At 08:12 AM 5/14/02 -0400, Diane M. Parsons wrote: > > >I herby formally submit my resignation as a AB Board Member, effective May >14, 2002. This decision has come after much soul-searching and is final. > >Personal concerns have been a huge factor in making this decision, >including my firm belief that personal conflicts and inflated egos among >my fellow Board Members will never allow us to accomplish the duties we >set out to do in the first place. > >I wish each and everyone of you all the best and pray that you are able to >learn to work together just a wee bit better. > >Diane Montgomery Parsons > >May 14, 2002 From ???@??? Fri May 17 17:25:32 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4H7koFs000193 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 03:46:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4H7kmHw028324 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 03:46:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g4H7kD803503; Fri, 17 May 2002 01:46:13 -0600 Resent-Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 01:46:13 -0600 X-Original-Sender: tstowell@chattanooga.net Fri May 17 01:46:12 2002 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20020517034815.0143a100@mail.chattanooga.net> X-Sender: foghorn@mail.chattanooga.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 03:48:15 -0400 Old-To: board-exec-l@rootsweb.com From: Tim Stowell Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1922 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: `!?"!j[1!!a-8"!(d,!! I've been contacted by a CC who wishes to volunteer as a mediator. Included in the note was a request as to how to go about doing such. Anyone? Tim From ???@??? Fri May 17 17:25:55 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4HFWbFs007012 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 11:32:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4HFWaHw018472 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 11:32:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g4HFVDf20191; Fri, 17 May 2002 09:31:13 -0600 Resent-Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 09:31:13 -0600 X-Original-Sender: wchs@getgoin.net Fri May 17 09:31:12 2002 Message-ID: <000701c1fdb8$59778760$5628c141@wchs> From: "Phyllis Rippee" Old-To: References: <3.0.5.32.20020517034815.0143a100@mail.chattanooga.net> Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:34:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Declude-Spoolname: D217af40300586423.SMD Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1923 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: &*X"!IV"#!eQ&"!8hM"! The mediation process that was approved by a former AB, establishes the selection of 5 AB members to serve as mediators. I don't believe it allows for anyone else to serve as such. Phyllis ----- Original Message ----- From: Tim Stowell To: Sent: 17 May, 2002 2:48 AM Subject: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer > I've been contacted by a CC who wishes to volunteer as a mediator. > > Included in the note was a request as to how to go about doing such. > > Anyone? > > Tim > > From ???@??? Sun May 19 08:35:20 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4JAjBFs021204 for ; Sun, 19 May 2002 06:45:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4JAj9Hw010886 for ; Sun, 19 May 2002 06:45:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g4JAif905081; Sun, 19 May 2002 04:44:41 -0600 Resent-Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 04:44:41 -0600 X-Original-Sender: tstowell@chattanooga.net Sun May 19 04:44:41 2002 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20020519021018.01493e90@mail.chattanooga.net> X-Sender: tstowell@mail.chattanooga.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 02:10:18 -0400 Old-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com From: Tim Stowell Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer In-Reply-To: <000701c1fdb8$59778760$5628c141@wchs> References: <3.0.5.32.20020517034815.0143a100@mail.chattanooga.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1924 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: @Vp!!F7,!![oN"!,>P!! Perhaps it is time to review that policy, since apparently in the recent North Carolina incident - it wasn't used. Perhaps it is time to include some CCs in the effort. Tim At 10:34 AM 5/17/02 -0500, you wrote: >The mediation process that was approved by a former AB, establishes the >selection of 5 AB members to serve as mediators. I don't believe it allows >for anyone else to serve as such. > >Phyllis >----- Original Message ----- >From: Tim Stowell >To: >Sent: 17 May, 2002 2:48 AM >Subject: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer > > >> I've been contacted by a CC who wishes to volunteer as a mediator. >> >> Included in the note was a request as to how to go about doing such. >> >> Anyone? >> >> Tim >> >> > > From ???@??? Sun May 19 19:54:15 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4JISSFs017245 for ; Sun, 19 May 2002 14:28:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4JISRHw020009 for ; Sun, 19 May 2002 14:28:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g4JIRm427675; Sun, 19 May 2002 12:27:48 -0600 Resent-Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 12:27:48 -0600 X-Original-Sender: kheidel@tri.net Sun May 19 12:27:48 2002 Message-ID: <002301c1ff63$1f782fe0$91f499cd@sasnak.net> From: "Kathy Heidel" Old-To: References: <3.0.5.32.20020517034815.0143a100@mail.chattanooga.net> <3.0.5.32.20020519021018.01493e90@mail.chattanooga.net> <00b901c1ff5d$261905a0$40a028d8@hppav> Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 13:29:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1926 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: [A?!!]UN"! To: Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 12:46 PM Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer > I agree. > > Ron > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tim Stowell" > To: > Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 2:10 AM > Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer > > > > Perhaps it is time to review that policy, since apparently in the recent > > North Carolina incident - it wasn't used. > > > > Perhaps it is time to include some CCs in the effort. > > > > Tim > > > > At 10:34 AM 5/17/02 -0500, you wrote: > > >The mediation process that was approved by a former AB, establishes the > > >selection of 5 AB members to serve as mediators. I don't believe it > allows > > >for anyone else to serve as such. > > > > > >Phyllis > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: Tim Stowell > > >To: > > >Sent: 17 May, 2002 2:48 AM > > >Subject: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer > > > > > > > > >> I've been contacted by a CC who wishes to volunteer as a mediator. > > >> > > >> Included in the note was a request as to how to go about doing such. > > >> > > >> Anyone? > > >> > > >> Tim > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > From ???@??? Sun May 19 19:54:15 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4JIiDFs018175 for ; Sun, 19 May 2002 14:44:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4JIiCHw021395 for ; Sun, 19 May 2002 14:44:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g4JIhiW11763; Sun, 19 May 2002 12:43:44 -0600 Resent-Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 12:43:44 -0600 X-Original-Sender: usgenweb@cox.net Sun May 19 12:43:43 2002 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020519144321.00a141c0@pop.east.cox.net> X-Sender: usgenweb@pop.east.cox.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 14:45:01 -0400 Old-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com From: Holly Timm Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer In-Reply-To: <002301c1ff63$1f782fe0$91f499cd@sasnak.net> References: <3.0.5.32.20020517034815.0143a100@mail.chattanooga.net> <3.0.5.32.20020519021018.01493e90@mail.chattanooga.net> <00b901c1ff5d$261905a0$40a028d8@hppav> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1927 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: :cL!!PKW!!8H8!!mi2!! At 01:29 PM 5/19/02 -0500, Kathy Heidel wrote: >I am not certain whether I agree or not, but I would like to know why it >wasn't used. Maybe if we start with the reasons for not using the Mediation >Team we could go from there. It wasn't even presented to the Mediation Team, >so how could the Team have resolved anything? It wasn't presented to the Mediation Team because the SC involved refused to participate in mediation and so it went straight to grievance. The Mediation Panel or Team will only work when both parties agree to use it. >Kathy Heidel > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ron Eason" >To: >Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 12:46 PM >Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer > > > > I agree. > > > > Ron > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tim Stowell" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 2:10 AM > > Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer > > > > > > > Perhaps it is time to review that policy, since apparently in the recent > > > North Carolina incident - it wasn't used. > > > > > > Perhaps it is time to include some CCs in the effort. > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > At 10:34 AM 5/17/02 -0500, you wrote: > > > >The mediation process that was approved by a former AB, establishes the > > > >selection of 5 AB members to serve as mediators. I don't believe it > > allows > > > >for anyone else to serve as such. > > > > > > > >Phyllis > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: Tim Stowell > > > >To: > > > >Sent: 17 May, 2002 2:48 AM > > > >Subject: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer > > > > > > > > > > > >> I've been contacted by a CC who wishes to volunteer as a mediator. > > > >> > > > >> Included in the note was a request as to how to go about doing such. > > > >> > > > >> Anyone? > > > >> > > > >> Tim > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From ???@??? Sun May 19 19:54:41 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4JKpfFs026954 for ; Sun, 19 May 2002 16:51:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4JKpeHw002744 for ; Sun, 19 May 2002 16:51:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g4JKpAs30469; Sun, 19 May 2002 14:51:10 -0600 Resent-Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 14:51:10 -0600 X-Original-Sender: kheidel@tri.net Sun May 19 14:51:10 2002 Message-ID: <001101c1ff77$2676de40$97f499cd@sasnak.net> From: "Kathy Heidel" Old-To: References: <3.0.5.32.20020517034815.0143a100@mail.chattanooga.net> <3.0.5.32.20020519021018.01493e90@mail.chattanooga.net> <00b901c1ff5d$261905a0$40a028d8@hppav> <5.1.0.14.2.20020519144321.00a141c0@pop.east.cox.net> Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 15:52:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1928 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: Y?5"!:J7"!&H)!!e,b"! Duh! So I am wearing my USGW Dunce cap again....that is what I get for spending the last 7 hours digitizing art work for my sewing machine to stitch out.... at least it pays the bills for me to be Duh on this list. ;o} Sorry, Kathy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Holly Timm" To: Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 1:45 PM Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer > At 01:29 PM 5/19/02 -0500, Kathy Heidel wrote: > >I am not certain whether I agree or not, but I would like to know why it > >wasn't used. Maybe if we start with the reasons for not using the Mediation > >Team we could go from there. It wasn't even presented to the Mediation Team, > >so how could the Team have resolved anything? > > It wasn't presented to the Mediation Team because the SC involved refused > to participate in mediation and so it went straight to grievance. The > Mediation Panel or Team will only work when both parties agree to use it. > > >Kathy Heidel > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Ron Eason" > >To: > >Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 12:46 PM > >Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer > > > > > > > I agree. > > > > > > Ron > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Tim Stowell" > > > To: > > > Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 2:10 AM > > > Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps it is time to review that policy, since apparently in the recent > > > > North Carolina incident - it wasn't used. > > > > > > > > Perhaps it is time to include some CCs in the effort. > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > At 10:34 AM 5/17/02 -0500, you wrote: > > > > >The mediation process that was approved by a former AB, establishes the > > > > >selection of 5 AB members to serve as mediators. I don't believe it > > > allows > > > > >for anyone else to serve as such. > > > > > > > > > >Phyllis > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > > >From: Tim Stowell > > > > >To: > > > > >Sent: 17 May, 2002 2:48 AM > > > > >Subject: [Board-Exec] mediator volunteer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I've been contacted by a CC who wishes to volunteer as a mediator. > > > > >> > > > > >> Included in the note was a request as to how to go about doing such. > > > > >> > > > > >> Anyone? > > > > >> > > > > >> Tim > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From ???@??? Thu May 23 19:54:43 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4NCHgFs013007 for ; Thu, 23 May 2002 08:17:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4NCHeHw027824 for ; Thu, 23 May 2002 08:17:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g4NCH7613428; Thu, 23 May 2002 06:17:07 -0600 Resent-Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 06:17:07 -0600 X-Original-Sender: kheidel@tri.net Thu May 23 06:17:07 2002 Message-ID: <002d01c20253$ff739060$8bf499cd@sasnak.net> From: "Kathy Heidel" Old-To: References: <3.0.5.32.20020523011455.008ffdd0@mail.chattanooga.net> Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] Re: [BOARD-L] Fwd: NCGenWeb Official Address of Record Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 07:18:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1930 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: miD"!1%,#!g%k"!J To: Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:14 AM Subject: [Board-Exec] Re: [BOARD-L] Fwd: NCGenWeb Official Address of Record > From: JohnR238@aol.com > Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 09:10:57 EDT > Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Fwd: NCGenWeb Official Address of Record > To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com > CC: tstowell@chattanooga.net > > In a message dated 5/22/2002 7:34:36 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > tstowell@chattanooga.net writes: > > > 1 - Is Mr. Barnun a part of NCGenWeb? If not, it's none of his business. > 2 - Either way, it is none of our business any more than we should/would be > aware of any other state's project desire to have their own domain. > > Tim > > > I would like to remind Tim and others who are in a position of leadership > that since they have never taken steps to incorporate the project and > protect themselves from any lawsuits that may be brought for whatever > reason and from whatever sources that they are jointly and severally liable > for the actions of the members of the group and may be held liable in court. > > I am not a party to this action, nor do I have any knowledge as to the > particulars, I'm just pointing out your liability and exposure. > > John Rigdon > > From ???@??? Thu May 23 19:54:43 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4N5LcFs019181 for ; Thu, 23 May 2002 01:21:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g4N5LbHw016557 for ; Thu, 23 May 2002 01:21:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g4N5K2O23249; Wed, 22 May 2002 23:20:02 -0600 Resent-Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 23:20:02 -0600 X-Original-Sender: tstowell@chattanooga.net Wed May 22 23:20:02 2002 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20020523011455.008ffdd0@mail.chattanooga.net> X-Sender: foghorn@mail.chattanooga.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 01:14:55 -0400 Old-To: board-exec-l@rootsweb.com From: Tim Stowell Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [Board-Exec] Re: [BOARD-L] Fwd: NCGenWeb Official Address of Record Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1929 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: GM`!!8^I"!m4@!!#>c!! From: JohnR238@aol.com Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 09:10:57 EDT Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Fwd: NCGenWeb Official Address of Record To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com CC: tstowell@chattanooga.net In a message dated 5/22/2002 7:34:36 AM Eastern Daylight Time, tstowell@chattanooga.net writes: 1 - Is Mr. Barnun a part of NCGenWeb? If not, it's none of his business. 2 - Either way, it is none of our business any more than we should/would be aware of any other state's project desire to have their own domain. Tim I would like to remind Tim and others who are in a position of leadership that since they have never taken steps to incorporate the project and protect themselves from any lawsuits that may be brought for whatever reason and from whatever sources that they are jointly and severally liable for the actions of the members of the group and may be held liable in court. I am not a party to this action, nor do I have any knowledge as to the particulars, I'm just pointing out your liability and exposure. John Rigdon From ???@??? Tue Jun 11 06:06:02 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5B2qKV2027778 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 22:52:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5B2qJJI020910 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 22:52:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g5B2mpO12758; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 20:48:51 -0600 Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 20:48:51 -0600 X-Original-Sender: kheidel@tri.net Mon Jun 10 20:48:51 2002 From: "Kathy Heidel" Old-To: "Board-Exec" Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 21:50:33 -0500 Message-ID: <000901c210f2$c2d58b60$95f499cd@sasnak.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Subject: [Board-Exec] Mediation Panel Member? Resent-Message-ID: <4rNKVC.A.LHD.TUWB9@lists2.rootsweb.com> To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1933 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: 8&;!!#`b!!/N>"!O/X"! Holly, when Sundee left she was in the process of setting up the Mediation Panel and was supposedly going to number the members. I can't remember all of the Panel Members, I went to the Board Archives for votes and such and it has not been updated since the end of last year so that was of no help. Could you refresh us? I know 3 out of 5 members, Isaiah, Diane, myself and ? ? were on this panel. Thanks, Kathy From ???@??? Tue Jun 11 15:05:39 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5BAvxV2025454 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 06:58:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5BAvwJI007867 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 06:57:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g5BAvKg10087; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 04:57:20 -0600 Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 04:57:20 -0600 X-Original-Sender: usgenweb@cox.net Tue Jun 11 04:57:20 2002 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020611065547.02a83850@pop.east.cox.net> X-Sender: usgenweb@pop.east.cox.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 06:57:17 -0400 Old-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com From: Holly Timm Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] Mediation Panel Member? In-Reply-To: <000901c210f2$c2d58b60$95f499cd@sasnak.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1935 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-IMAPbase: 1023812640 28 X-UIDL: L%$"!K&4"!;~8!!4ji!! Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1 At 09:50 PM 6/10/02 -0500, Kathy Heidel wrote: >Holly, when Sundee left she was in the process of setting up the >Mediation Panel and was supposedly going to number the members. >I can't remember all of the Panel Members, I went to the Board Archives >for votes and such and it has not been updated since the end of last >year so that was of no help. Could you refresh us? Kathy, as I have said previously, I lost every bit of my email prior to early May as well as many other files so I don't have this handy. Does anyone else have this list handy? or... willl the other two panel members identify themselves? >I know 3 out of 5 members, Isaiah, Diane, myself and ? ? were on this >panel. >Thanks, >Kathy From ???@??? Tue Jun 11 15:05:39 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5BB4VV2025816 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 07:04:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5BB4UJI008599 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 07:04:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g5BB43U02131; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 05:04:03 -0600 Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 05:04:03 -0600 X-Original-Sender: tsvickery@adelphia.net Tue Jun 11 05:04:03 2002 Message-ID: <000001c21137$73a100c0$a0263218@bur.adelphia.net> From: "Tina S Vickery" Old-To: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020611065547.02a83850@pop.east.cox.net> Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] Mediation Panel Member? Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 07:01:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1936 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: jB@"!_3+!!H;8!!Yp9!! Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4 I am one of the missing two. Tina ----- Original Message ----- From: Holly Timm To: Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:57 AM Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] Mediation Panel Member? > At 09:50 PM 6/10/02 -0500, Kathy Heidel wrote: > >Holly, when Sundee left she was in the process of setting up the > >Mediation Panel and was supposedly going to number the members. > >I can't remember all of the Panel Members, I went to the Board Archives > >for votes and such and it has not been updated since the end of last > >year so that was of no help. Could you refresh us? > > Kathy, as I have said previously, I lost every bit of my email prior to > early May as well as many other files so I don't have this handy. Does > anyone else have this list handy? or... willl the other two panel members > identify themselves? > > >I know 3 out of 5 members, Isaiah, Diane, myself and ? ? were on this > >panel. > >Thanks, > >Kathy > From ???@??? Tue Jun 11 15:05:39 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5BEmKV2012740 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:48:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5BEmJJI004307 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:48:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g5BElel29670; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 08:47:40 -0600 Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 08:47:40 -0600 X-Original-Sender: kheidel@tri.net Tue Jun 11 08:47:40 2002 From: "Kathy Heidel" Old-To: Subject: RE: [Board-Exec] Mediation Panel Member? Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:49:18 -0500 Message-ID: <001701c21157$2b302e40$91f499cd@sasnak.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <000001c21137$73a100c0$a0263218@bur.adelphia.net> Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1937 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: ^P~!!Ll7!!Z5>!!pd;"! Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 25 Thanks Tina, Kathy -----Original Message----- From: Tina S Vickery [mailto:tsvickery@adelphia.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:02 AM To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] Mediation Panel Member? I am one of the missing two. Tina ----- Original Message ----- From: Holly Timm To: Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 6:57 AM Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] Mediation Panel Member? > At 09:50 PM 6/10/02 -0500, Kathy Heidel wrote: > >Holly, when Sundee left she was in the process of setting up the > >Mediation Panel and was supposedly going to number the members. > >I can't remember all of the Panel Members, I went to the Board Archives > >for votes and such and it has not been updated since the end of last > >year so that was of no help. Could you refresh us? > > Kathy, as I have said previously, I lost every bit of my email prior to > early May as well as many other files so I don't have this handy. Does > anyone else have this list handy? or... willl the other two panel members > identify themselves? > > >I know 3 out of 5 members, Isaiah, Diane, myself and ? ? were on this > >panel. > >Thanks, > >Kathy > From ???@??? Tue Jun 11 15:05:39 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5BEnlV2012810 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:49:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5BEnkJI004425 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:49:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g5BEnDO30836; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 08:49:13 -0600 Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 08:49:13 -0600 X-Original-Sender: kheidel@tri.net Tue Jun 11 08:49:13 2002 From: "Kathy Heidel" Old-To: "Board-Exec" Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:50:58 -0500 Message-ID: <001801c21157$66727800$91f499cd@sasnak.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Subject: [Board-Exec] Will? Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1938 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: KU)!!M/X!!746"!h'g"! Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 26 Will Mediator #5 Please stand up? ;o} We are looking for you.... Kathy From ???@??? Tue Jun 11 20:15:38 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5BLTOV2020556 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 17:29:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5BLTNJI029124 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 17:29:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g5BLSa001725; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:28:36 -0600 Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:28:36 -0600 X-Original-Sender: kheidel@tri.net Tue Jun 11 15:28:35 2002 Message-ID: <005c01c2118f$2d516620$9cf499cd@sasnak.net> From: "Kathy Heidel" Old-To: "Board-Exec" Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:30:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Subject: [Board-Exec] I have a question Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1939 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: ?;`!! Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5BMJDV2024530 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:19:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5BMJCJI005362 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:19:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g5BMIbP19965; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:18:37 -0600 Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:18:37 -0600 X-Original-Sender: pamreid@comcast.net Tue Jun 11 16:18:37 2002 Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:17:57 -0400 From: Pam Reid Subject: RE: [Board-Exec] I have a question In-reply-to: <005c01c2118f$2d516620$9cf499cd@sasnak.net> Old-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1940 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: K)I"!;-0"!<8F!!cPa!! Kathy - after you pointed out that the motions pages hadn't been updated in so long I went in to take a look. I was VERY surprised to find that the last few updates I had done weren't there. Don't know what happened. So, I got them uploaded again. I went back through all of my Board mails and several of those motions got VERY confusing - they were amended and we voted on amendments, then they were amended again and we voted on new amendments, then we voted as to whether or not to vote, then we finally voted on the motions. Got to be a bit of a mess actually. The only voting reflected on the website are the actual votes for the final versions of motions. I don't have anything on the Mediation Panel at all. Back in October 2001 we passed a motion to create the panel, but I don't have anything beyond that. Sorry - Pam -----Original Message----- From: Kathy Heidel [mailto:kheidel@tri.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 5:30 PM To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [Board-Exec] I have a question As I said last evening about trying to find the information for the Meditation Panel there was not one thing posted after Jan, I went in just now and double checked and I see someone has been busy. Could that someone please post the Mediation Panel list to the AB? I would greatly appreciate this. Also, I would like to state a couple of things, previously the various States which had problems as a general rule dealt with those squabbles within their Region first. I personally believe that Ron being the only person available to attempt this was being up front with the assumption that there was bias, and therefore was not the person to be handling this problem. May I suggest that Holly appoint someone, perhaps 2 someone's, other than herself or Teresa to work with John and Tim see if this could be resolved? I would guess that normally there would be 3 people, the SC Rep and the 2 CC Reps who would be doing this for this Region. With Tim being personally involved, Diane no longer a Rep, and Ron, biased, others should try to work this out. Also out of respect for those involved this should be done on this list as this is a Personnel Matter. There is no absolutely no reason to act as a bunch clowns on the Board List. Kathy All kids are gifted; some just open their packages earlier than others. (Michael Carr) From ???@??? Wed Jun 12 18:36:30 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5C1DeV2007467 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:13:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5C1DdJI025686 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:13:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g5C1Co508279; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:12:50 -0600 Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:12:50 -0600 X-Original-Sender: kheidel@tri.net Tue Jun 11 19:12:49 2002 Message-ID: <005a01c211ae$86413fc0$a9f499cd@sasnak.net> From: "Kathy Heidel" Old-To: References: Subject: Re: [Board-Exec] I have a question Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 20:14:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Resent-Message-ID: <9KQsgB.A.NBC.SAqB9@lists2.rootsweb.com> To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1941 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: UR^!!k3O!!J-8"!WLF"! Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2 Thanks Pam, I too thought I was seeing things . It is difficult to follow along, much less trying to reconstruct what was, might be and never will become. You did a fine job as far as I am concerned and thanks again for your work. Kathy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pam Reid" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 5:17 PM Subject: RE: [Board-Exec] I have a question > Kathy - after you pointed out that the motions pages hadn't been updated in > so long I went in to take a look. I was VERY surprised to find that the > last few updates I had done weren't there. Don't know what happened. So, I > got them uploaded again. > > I went back through all of my Board mails and several of those motions got > VERY confusing - they were amended and we voted on amendments, then they > were amended again and we voted on new amendments, then we voted as to > whether or not to vote, then we finally voted on the motions. Got to be a > bit of a mess actually. The only voting reflected on the website are the > actual votes for the final versions of motions. > > I don't have anything on the Mediation Panel at all. Back in October 2001 we > passed a motion to create the panel, but I don't have anything beyond that. > > Sorry - Pam > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kathy Heidel [mailto:kheidel@tri.net] > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 5:30 PM > To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: [Board-Exec] I have a question > > > As I said last evening about trying to find the information for the > Meditation Panel there was not one thing posted after Jan, I went in just > now and double checked and I see someone has been busy. Could that someone > please post the Mediation Panel list to the AB? I would greatly appreciate > this. > Also, I would like to state a couple of things, previously the various > States which had problems as a general rule dealt with those squabbles > within their Region first. I personally believe that Ron being the only > person available to attempt this was being up front with the assumption that > there was bias, and therefore was not the person to be handling this > problem. > May I suggest that Holly appoint someone, perhaps 2 someone's, other than > herself or Teresa to work with John and Tim see if this could be resolved? > I would guess that normally there would be 3 people, the SC Rep and the 2 CC > Reps who would be doing this for this Region. With Tim being personally > involved, Diane no longer a Rep, and Ron, biased, others should try to work > this out. > Also out of respect for those involved this should be done on this list as > this is a Personnel Matter. There is no absolutely no reason to act as a > bunch clowns on the Board List. > Kathy > > > > All kids are gifted; some just open their packages earlier than others. > (Michael Carr) > > > > From ???@??? Thu Jun 13 18:54:12 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5DEXuV2017218 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:33:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5DEXtJI002326 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:33:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g5DEXIX06504; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 08:33:18 -0600 Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 08:33:18 -0600 X-Original-Sender: wchs@getgoin.net Thu Jun 13 08:33:18 2002 Message-ID: <000701c212e7$86711b20$c2967a3f@wchs> From: "Phyllis Rippee" Old-To: Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:35:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Declude-Spoolname: Dacfa184d0224ea85.SMD Subject: [Board-Exec] Mediation Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1951 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: 337!!WC6"!nH!#!6N:"! Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 15 According to the Mediation Process that was approved by the previous AB, there is to be only ONE mediator. Once 5 AB members were selected to be mediators, the Board Secretary was to put their names in a container and draw them out to determine the order in which grievances would be assigned, but who was "up" was not to be known until a grievance was filed. THAT person was to contact the parties involved to see IF mediation was agreeable to them. THAT person was to sub the parties involved to a private list and be an "enabler" for discussions to lead to a possible agreement. Even making IRC possible for the parties involved. THAT person was to remain neutral at ALL times. THAT person was then to report the results to the Advisory Board "in Executive Session." The AB was to review the results to see that whatever agreement was reached was not in conflict with USGW P Bylaws. Phyllis From ???@??? Thu Jun 13 18:54:12 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5DGcMV2029556 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:38:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5DGcLJI019502 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:38:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g5DGbgX18793; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:37:42 -0600 Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:37:42 -0600 X-Original-Sender: janab@websweweave.net Thu Jun 13 10:37:42 2002 From: "Jana Black" Old-To: Subject: RE: [Board-Exec] Mediation Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:39:04 -0700 Message-ID: <011101c212f8$d4bc6120$f2a4ec0c@JANA> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-reply-to: <000701c212e7$86711b20$c2967a3f@wchs> Importance: Normal Resent-Message-ID: <_X14LD.A.blE.WpMC9@lists2.rootsweb.com> To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1952 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: _3-"!Wpa!!/YO"!L-9!! Phyllis, Thank you. I thought we had a panel if mediators to rotate thru potential grievances so no one would think anyone of "the" mediators was biased.... We still have three mediators available. I am certain one of them can handle this well. Given that we do not seem to have a secretary, how would THE mediator for this instance get chosen??? Once the person is chosen, just as in the mediation involving the EC and the RAL, I am sure something can be worked out that feels equitable to all. Remember, I served as a witness for the EC and Robert Served as a witness for the RAL.... So, having others "in the room" is not w/o precedent. Jana -----Original Message----- From: Phyllis Rippee [mailto:wchs@getgoin.net] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 7:35 AM To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [Board-Exec] Mediation According to the Mediation Process that was approved by the previous AB, there is to be only ONE mediator. Once 5 AB members were selected to be mediators, the Board Secretary was to put their names in a container and draw them out to determine the order in which grievances would be assigned, but who was "up" was not to be known until a grievance was filed. THAT person was to contact the parties involved to see IF mediation was agreeable to them. THAT person was to sub the parties involved to a private list and be an "enabler" for discussions to lead to a possible agreement. Even making IRC possible for the parties involved. THAT person was to remain neutral at ALL times. THAT person was then to report the results to the Advisory Board "in Executive Session." The AB was to review the results to see that whatever agreement was reached was not in conflict with USGW P Bylaws. Phyllis From ???@??? Thu Jun 13 18:54:12 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5DHUXV2004386 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:30:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5DHUVJI026443 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:30:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g5DHTjg02700; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:29:45 -0600 Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:29:45 -0600 X-Original-Sender: wchs@getgoin.net Thu Jun 13 11:29:44 2002 Message-ID: <000701c21300$333c1ae0$d6967a3f@wchs> From: "Phyllis Rippee" Old-To: Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:31:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Declude-Spoolname: Dd660042601d2a049.SMD Subject: [Board-Exec] Mediation Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1953 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: a>B!!0W!#![kd!!ZCG!! Yes, Jana According to the Mediation Process that was approved, each party involved in the "difference of opinion" is allowed to have an advisor/counselor. This advisor/counselor can be any member of the USGW P, or the party involved can waive the right to have an advisor/counselor present. The Process document also states that all exchanges during mediation will be kept confidential and ONLY the final result will be presented to the Advisory Board. If mediation fails, or if one of the parties refuses to participate in the mediation process, a formal request asking the Advisory Board to act can be made. But, the Process document specifically states that the person filing a formal grievance with the Advisory Board must realize the limited authority of the Advisory Board and that is why resolving the issue through the mediation process is recommended. Phyllis From ???@??? Thu Jun 13 18:54:12 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5DI5rV2007349 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:05:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5DI5qJI000899 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:05:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g5DI5DG09801; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:05:13 -0600 Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:05:13 -0600 X-Original-Sender: kheidel@tri.net Thu Jun 13 12:05:13 2002 Message-ID: <000701c21305$1b1943c0$9cf499cd@sasnak.net> From: "Kathy Heidel" Old-To: "Board-Exec" Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:06:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Subject: [Board-Exec] Leaving Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1954 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: gJ!#!e+\!!k4U!!Q#Z!! I will be gone for a few days, just to let you all know. Kathy All kids are gifted; some just open their packages earlier than others. (Michael Carr) From ???@??? Tue Jun 18 06:07:47 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5I62aV2027128 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 02:02:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com (lists2.rootsweb.com [63.92.80.32]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5I62ZJI015688 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 02:02:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g5I61e512364; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 00:01:40 -0600 Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 00:01:40 -0600 X-Original-Sender: tstowell@chattanooga.net Tue Jun 18 00:01:39 2002 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20020618010402.023d5990@mail.chattanooga.net> X-Sender: tstowell@mail.chattanooga.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 01:04:02 -0400 Old-To: BOARD-exec-L@rootsweb.com From: Tim Stowell In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020617180207.00a407d0@pop.east.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: [Board-Exec] Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 02-11 SEMA CC Rep Vacancy - RESULTS Resent-Message-ID: To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Resent-From: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Reply-To: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1956 X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com X-UIDL: 5pp!!CYk"!=I_"!7?S"! Apparently my mail was down sometime over the weekend for I show exactly 3 votes: starting with Jana's vote at 5:16 PM on 6/14 and ending with Vickie's on 6/16 at 10:31 AM. Would someone kindly forward me copies of all the mail from that time period that I apparently missed? Thanks, Tim At 06:07 PM 6/17/02 -0400, you wrote: > >With 11 voting, all affirmatively, and 3 not voting, the following motion >made by Mary Ann Hetrick and seconded by Kathy Heidel is numbered 02-11 is >declared passed. The winner of the SEMA CC Representative race will be >seated as soon as the election for that race is complete. > > >At 08:35 AM 6/12/02 -0400, Mary Ann Hetrick wrote: >I move that the vacancy due to Diane Parsons resignation be filled by the >will of the voters of that region. This will be accomplished during the >upcoming national elections. The winner of the seat to start their term as >soon as the election results are known, in place of the normal September 1 >starting date. > > From ???@??? Fri Jun 28 06:48:13 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5SAbgV2024476 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 06:37:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists2.rootsweb.com ([207.40.200.39]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5SAbfJT022132 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 06:37:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from slist@localhost) by lists2.rootsweb.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) id g5SAbbuH000516; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 04:37:37 -0600 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 04:37:37 -0600 Message-Id: <200206281037.g5SAbbuH000516@lists2.rootsweb.com> To: merope@Radix.Net Subject: Re: unsubscribe merope@Radix.Net X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com From: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com Precedence: junk X-UIDL: 1#/"!!7)"!06e!!C(9"! 32760 merope@Radix.Net merope@Radix.Net You have been removed from the list. If this wasn't your intention or you are having problems getting yourself unsubscribed, reply to this mail now (quoting it entirely (for diagnostic purposes), and of course adding any comments you see fit). Transcript of unsubscription request follows: -- >From merope@Radix.Net >From: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com >Reply-To: merope@Radix.Net >To: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com >Subject: unsubscribe merope@Radix.Net From ???@??? Fri Jun 28 18:26:20 2002 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5SHTFV2027643 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 13:29:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2]) by mail1.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5SHTEJT010184 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 13:29:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jadth.radix.net (pcp01205918pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net [68.50.227.225]) by mtaout04.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 13 2002)) with ESMTP id <0GYF00JSEF81G9@mtaout04.icomcast.net> for merope@radix.net; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 13:28:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 13:38:09 -0400 From: merope Subject: Fwd: Re: unsubscribe merope@Radix.Net X-Sender: merope@radix.net To: BOARD-EXEC: ; Message-id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020628133726.00ab07b0@radix.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-UIDL: a+L!!9W`!!hPG!!&?H!! Hmmm... this was rather sudden. -Teresa merope@radix.net >Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 04:37:37 -0600 >To: merope@Radix.Net >Subject: Re: unsubscribe merope@Radix.Net >X-Loop: Board-Exec-L@rootsweb.com >From: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com > > 32760 merope@Radix.Net >merope@Radix.Net > >You have been removed from the list. > >If this wasn't your intention or you are having problems getting yourself >unsubscribed, reply to this mail now (quoting it entirely (for diagnostic >purposes), and of course adding any comments you see fit). > >Transcript of unsubscription request follows: >-- > >From merope@Radix.Net > >From: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com > >Reply-To: merope@Radix.Net > >To: Board-Exec-L-request@rootsweb.com > >Subject: unsubscribe merope@Radix.Net